In the heliocentric model, Earth is just one of 8 “planets” in our “solar system,” all of which are said to be huge spherical Earth-like habitations or globular gas giants millions of miles away. They claim the Earth under our feet along with these 7 other planets all revolve concentric circles/ellipses around the Sun - hence the term “heliocentric.” The previously prevailing “geocentric” model had placed the Earth as the immovable center of the universe with the Sun, Moon, stars and “planets” all revolving around us, just as they appear. In the heliocentric model, however, which would be more appropriately titled the “Acentric” model, the Sun is only the center of our “solar system,” while itself supposedly simultaneously revolving 500,000 mph spirals around the “Milky Way galaxy” which itself is constantly shooting 670,000,000 mph away from an alleged “Big Bang” creationary explosion at the beginning of time!
In the heliocentric model, the wandering stars are all supposedly spherical Earth-like places several million miles away from us, while the fixed stars are all allegedly super-distant “suns,” similar to our own, but several trillion miles away, complete with their own “solar systems” and accompanying planets, perhaps even populated with sentient alien beings like ourselves! NASA’s current “official” astronomical statistics state that there are upwards of 10 trillion such “planets” in our “galaxy” alone, and at least 200 billion galaxies in the universe! Therefore, they claim, Earth is only 1 of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, or one septillion planets in the universe!
“Our Modem Astronomers imagine the Stars to be immense
worlds or suns, some of them many thousands of times larger than our own, and
at an enormous distance. Sir Robert Ball, in his ‘Cause of an Ice-Age,’ p. 77,
says of Sirius - that it is ‘a million times as distant from us as the Sun’ -
that is, that it is ninety-two millions of millions of miles from the Earth! It
is thought that Stars are in a more or less advanced state of development, and
that probably some of them may be already inhabited by beings suited to their
spheres. Their distance from us they calculate to be so immense, that,
according to Sir William Herschel, the light from some of them will take a
thousand years to reach this world of ours!” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (153)
“Again, these stars are assumed to have positions so far
from the earth that the distance is almost inexpressible; figures, indeed, may
be arranged on paper, but in reading them no practical idea is conveyed to the
mind. Many are said to be so distant that should they fall with the velocity of
light, or above 160,000 miles in a second of time, 600,000,000 of miles per
hour, they would require nearly 2,000,000 of years to reach the earth! Sir
William Herschel, in a paper on ‘The power of telescopes to penetrate into
space,’ affirms that with his powerful instruments he
discovered brilliant luminaries so far from the earth that the light which they
emitted ‘could not have been less than one million nine hundred thousand years
in its progress!’" -Dr. Samuel
Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (376)
“The fixed stars are so called, because except for very long periods, they do not appreciably alter their relative positions; and they are mere points of light, so small that the most powerful telescopes cannot magnify them into discs. Yet they are supposed to be suns of immense size, removed by the astronomers to immeasurable distances away from us, for the credit and convenience of their theories.” -Albert Smith, “The Sea-Earth Globe and Its Monstrous Hypothetical Motions” (32)
“The planets are not solid, opaque masses of matter, as
is believed. They are simply immaterial, luminous and transparent discs.” -Gabrielle Henriet, “Heaven and Earth” (23)
“By the aid of the telescope have been discovered in the
starry vault in the celestial fields which light traverses, as in the corallas
of our flowering plants, and in the metallic oxides, almost every gradation of
prismatic colour between the two extremes of refrangibility. In a cluster near the Southern Cross - red,
green, blue, and bluish green - appear in large telescopes, like gems of many
colours, like a superb piece of fancy jewellery.” -Alexander von Humboldt
If stars are all distant planets or suns, how is it that various phenomena have often been observed including stars changing color, intensity of light, sudden appearance, disappearance, or shooting quickly from one place to another? I have watched single stars changing their colors as regularly as a disco ball, others shooting through the sky and disappearing, and stranger still, I once saw a star shoot quickly straight upwards through the sky for two seconds and then stop again!
If stars are all distant planets or suns, how is it that various phenomena have often been observed including stars changing color, intensity of light, sudden appearance, disappearance, or shooting quickly from one place to another? I have watched single stars changing their colors as regularly as a disco ball, others shooting through the sky and disappearing, and stranger still, I once saw a star shoot quickly straight upwards through the sky for two seconds and then stop again!
“In the time of Tycho Brahe it was said that the earth
revolved around the sun, but he argued that if the earth revolved around the
sun, the relative position of the stars would change very much, and the matter
must, in the nature of the case, be easily detected. Accordingly, experiments were tried at intervals
of six months, and the result showed that the stars were in exactly the same
position as they had occupied six months before, thus proving that the earth
does not move at all.” -Thomas
Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (122)
“If the earth is at a given point in space on say January
1st, and according to present-day science, at a distance of 190,000,000 miles
from that point six months afterwards, it follows that the relative position
and directions of the stars will have greatly changed, however small the angle
of parallax may be. That this great change is nowhere apparent and has never
been observed incontestably proves that the earth is at rest - that it
does not move in an orbit round the sun.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (67)
When Tycho Brahe demonstrated that after 190,000,000 miles
of supposed orbit around the Sun, not a single inch of parallax could be
detected, heliocentrists desperate to patch the glaring hole in their theory,
pushed their hypothetical distances to the stars into the trillions of miles,
claiming the closest one, Proxima Centauri, was a ludicrous 25 trillion miles
away, and thereby making all the stars so conveniently far that no appreciable
parallax could be detected! This
expedient explanation, which heliocentrists have clung to ever since, has
proven satisfactory to silence the manipulated minds of the masses, but still
fails to adequately account for several issues.
“Considerably more than a million Earths would be
required to make up a body like the Sun -the astronomers tell us: and more than
53,000 suns would be wanted to equal the cubic contents of the star Vega. And
Vega is a ‘small star!’ And there are countless millions of these stars! And it
takes 30,000,000 years for the light of some of those stars to reach us at
12,000,000 miles in a minute! And, says Mr. Proctor, ‘I think a moderate
estimate of the age of the Earth would be 500,000,000 years!’ ‘Its weight,’
says the same individual, ‘is 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 tons!’ Now, since
no human being is able to comprehend these things, the giving of them to the
world is an insult - an outrage. And though they have all risen from the one
assumption that Earth is a planet, instead of upholding the assumption, they
drag it down by the weight of their own absurdity, and leave it lying in the
dust - a proof that Earth is not a globe.”
-William Carpenter, “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” (75)
Several experiments have since been performed and repeated by
notable scientists like Albert Michelson, Edward Morley, George Airy, and
Georges Sagnac proving that it is the stars that revolve around a stationary
Earth and not the other way around. The conclusive
results of their experiments are not contested or even mentioned in modern
astronomy books; rather they are conveniently swept under the carpet to keep
prying minds from seeing through the lies.
For example, the experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” (since it failed
to prove heliocentricity) involved filling a telescope with water to slow the
speed of light inside. Usually
telescopes must be slightly tilted to get starlight down the axis of the tube
supposedly due to “Earth's speed around the sun.” Airy discovered that actually
the starlight was already coming in at the correct angle so no change was
necessary. This demonstrated that the stars move relative to a stationary Earth
and not the other way around, because if it was the telescope moving he would
have to change the angle.
“All the planets, including the sun, revolve round the
earth. These circumstances cannot be denied since they are plainly visible,
either in the ordinary way with the naked eye, or with the help of the
telescope. It can be said, in this connection, that in the case of a science
which should be based exclusively on observation and not on speculation such as
astronomy, the evidence of the senses is the only factor upon which conclusions
can, and must be, based. If the planets can be seen revolving round the earth,
it is for the decisive factor that they do revolve in such a way. It is
asserted that this is not so, and it is maintained that the earth and the
planets revolve round the sun. We note with astonishment, however, the bizarre
and definitely suspicious fact that these planetary movements are not visible.
They cannot be seen and yet they are called real! How then can these movements
be proved and their speed be ascertained since they are invisible? On the other
hand, the existing geocentric planetary motions which can be observed and
measured, and which, consequently, constitute a perfectly valid system, are condemned
as unreal and apparent! A pertinent remark may, incidentally, be made on the
subject. Why do the astronomical tables which are published year after year,
give the so-called apparent movements of the planets in the zodiac? Why take
the trouble of calculating and putting them on record at all if they are not
real? Why is it also that no mention is made of the so-called real movements of
the planets?” -Gabrielle Henriet,
“Heaven and Earth” (15-16)
“Trust your eyes and your cameras! They have no reason to
deceive you about whether the stars are going around nightly! Then get it in
your mind: This single fact surrounding star trails that has been photographed
thousands of times and cannot be denied must be explained away by the
Theoretical Science Establishment. All of the factless allegations - a rotating
and orbiting Earth; billions of light year distances to the stars; a 15 billion
year old universe; the whole Big Bang Paradigm; all of the alleged evolution of
the universe, earth, and mankind; that is to say: all of modern evolution-based
cosmology controlling ‘knowledge’ today, all of it, is completely undone if the
stars are doing what cameras show they are doing, namely, going around the
Earth nightly ... If you can do so for a few minutes, just lay aside the
Copernican indoctrination that accompanies such pictures and take a good hard
look at these photographs of something that really, really happens every single
night. Do you see what I see? I see all the visible stars in the northern skies
going around the North Star in perfect circles. In other words, I see all the
stars which these time exposures have recorded actually going around that navigational
star that God put there for us in the Northern Hemisphere.” -Marshall Hall, "The Size and
Structure of the Universe"
8 comments:
Government Trolls Are Using ‘Psychology-Based Influence Techniques’ On YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc.!
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/government-trolls-are-using-psychology-based-influence-techniques-on-youtube-facebook-and-twitter
Hello Eric , Quick question. I'm curious why you chose to move to Thailand. I have read your interviews but they never really went into a whole lot. They were quite short, leaving me wondering why it was you wished to live in Asia? I'm curious because i too wish to live in Japan but I am afraid of the change and wish to know how you kind of settled into your new home , was it difficult with not knowing the native language? stuff like that, i'm thinking it might help me in the end if by making me a bit more comfortable to leave what i know for a place i know nothing of.
Thanks Eric.
We know that the Earth is a ball spinning hundreds of miles an hour in an easterly direction and the atmosphere keeps pace with it and so appears to be still because of er, gravity, and um, relativity and stuff. This is even more miraculous than first it seems, because the horizontal force of gravity which pushes the air along is not constant, but varies with latitude. The further away from the equator you are, the less the circumference of the Earth, therefore the less the speed it must have to return to its relative position one day later. Less speed, less force pushing it. Most people here will have worked this out already of course, but it has occurred to me that the same thing applies with altitude. If the Earth is a ball, the higher you get the bigger the size of the ball, therefore the further the air has to travel, therefore the faster the air has to move, therefore the greater the force pushing it. So the higher you are, the more gravity there is!
Therefore we can envisage the atmosphere as a 3D grid, with horizontal gravity (!) exerting increasing and decreasing amounts of force depending upon distance from the equator and height from the surface. That all makes sense doesn't it!
Thinking on this I remembered a little magical moment from a few years back. I was sitting at my desk on a summer's day when a wasp flew in through an open window. He was curious of me so I sat perfectly still to allow him to explore. At one point he flew so close to my face that I actually felt the waft of air from his wings on my forehead. It was a moment of quiet wonder. The thing is, that little wasp with his tiny wings could blithely push around the air regardless of the gravity the entire Earth was emitting. That's one mighty insect!
Eric I have read so much of your work, and am convinced that you are right about flat earth, but what I cannot get my head round is why we are on this flat earth and how we got here. In the old days some of the UFO and alien stuff made sense to me, but not now, unless we are talking of beings from another pond much like ours, or even sub levels of flat earths. Suppose we are under a firmament as suggested in the bible, but why? As a child I had an image in my head of being in such a situation, but like a plaything of some other child somewhere.
Have you looked at some of the other truthers out there exposing false flags and synchronicity by numerology. I am struggling to work out how this all fits together. When I look at the false flags, and suggestions that people are making such as Princess Diana not existing but being played by other people or even MI6 agents, that perhaps the Princess Diana death was not a death at all. The Bowie death, seems like it might just be a death of his persona, not the person, and the same with other celebrity people. Are all these untruths tied together as part of the lies surrounding flat earth? I would be interested in your thoughts.
I hope the message that I just posted as anonymous reached you as anonymous, I would not want to post in my real name. If it was wrong, please amend to anonymous before posting. Thank you.
I would just like to point out that Albert Michelson, Edward Morley, George Airy, and Georges Sagnac all died before 1940, one of them even died in the mid 1800s.
When I first saw the Gleason's map a week ago, I felt something strange similar to deja vu. I can not sleep and think about anything else since then. I watch everything that I can find on this subject, it is interesting that the yt algorithm gives me 90% of films that discredit and mock this theory, which is just a confirmation for me that "someone" is trying to manipulate me. I wonder if I'm crazy, I experience amazing things, most are frightening, but fear is not the worst feeling. It is the awareness of this virus in human brains that will do everything to defend the greatest lie of all. I make notes and try to create a key, orderly based on a certain hronology of "vaccination information" before you provide the most important component that is the fact of flat earth. The problem is, this is not a magical vaccine that will open people's eyes, people need "chemotherapy" because it's cancer. This "jump" is too big for ordinary people attached to the system.
I try to recreate my own way to the place where I am, so that I can mark the path. I think that the necessary element of the puzzle is the knowledge about Weishaupt, Rothschild's and Rockefeller's, when you get to know and understand the dependencies linking these names over 250 years with the most important events in the world history and the most important people in the world, "impossible" things do not exist. Then it's easier to understand why it's easier to "be a globe". People must understand that the earth globe is not the only lie but the most important, because it allows all the rest of the system's lies still exist, it's funny because it's just like a big sphere protects all lies inside.
What hurts me most is that the closest thing for me does not want to know the truth, I want to live in a "designed reality" than to seek the truth. I am ready to sacrifice everything that I have all my life, now there is no turning back. When you feel it, nothing is the same anymore, just like the glasses from "They Live". The strangest thing is that I've always felt it and I could not understand it, I was groping. I think there are a lot of people who also feel it .. I think that we have important missions before us, I think this mission is worth sacrificing everything. I'd rather die knowing the truth than living in a lie.
I apologize for the translator.
Hi Eric, this guy has a video that i ran across claiming to actually show Jupiter spinning >
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYsgyL7I8RI.......I say it's bullshit and he used two programs as well, AutoStakkert and RegiStax. He also uses the term animation. You may have seen it already, but i was just wondering what your input on this is?
Post a Comment