In the following presentation taken from my book, "The Flat Earth Conspiracy," I present the case for intelligent design and expose the many scientific frauds and Masonic connections of Darwinism and its main proponents throughout history. You will see how Neanderthal Man, Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Peking Man, Orce Man, Turkana Boy, Lucy and all other supposed ape-man transitional species were fakes and fabrications made by Masonic minions looking to advance their atheistic philosophy, cosmology, and cosmogeny. As an addendum to this, if you haven't already seen my video "Dinosaurs Never Existed" please watch this as well to fully understand the depth of this deception:
The popular modern scientific-materialist-atheist worldview
propagated by NASA, the mainstream media and the public education system is
that you are here because nothingness for no reason exploded and created
everything! Before time, space, matter,
consciousness, intelligence, and life, there was nothing. Then the nothingness exploded, and instead of
destroying things like every other explosion ever, this explosion created
things, created everything! The
nothingness explosion somehow created space, time and all matter in the
universe in an instant and for no reason at all. Then all the creationary explosive debris
flying outwards at over 670 million miles per hour for 14 billion years culminated
to create you!
Yes, first some of the more gaseous nothing came together
forming suns and stars, then solid pieces of the nothing came together forming
planets and moons, then the nothing-turned-hydrogen and oxygen came together
forming water on the nothing planet Earth, out of which single-celled living
organisms magically appeared, got to work dividing and multiplying into
multi-celled conscious organisms, which multiplied and divided and mutated into
various forms of sea-life which adapted and evolved and crawled onto land,
replaced gills with lungs, lost tails, grew opposable thumbs and started
grasping at straws like this ridiculous nihilistic notion of Big Bang
evolution.
This anti-God materialist theory of evolution has been
staunchly protected by the infallibility of “science” for over 150 years, but
in actual fact, just as “science” has failed to find one true, valid proof that
Earth is a ball spinning around the Sun, scientists have failed to discover a
single piece of evidence that the material world is a product of blind chance
evolution. Furthermore, Big Bang
evolution actually requires and pre-supposes many other claims which have
already been proven false in previous chapters, such as the Plurality of
Worlds, Newton’s theory of Gravity, Einstein’s theory of Relativity, Stars
being distant Suns, and Earth being a Planet, not a Plane.
“Evolutionary
theory claims that life started with a cell that formed by chance. According to this scenario, four billion
years ago various lifeless chemical compounds underwent a reaction in the
primordial atmosphere on the earth in which the effects of thunderbolts and
atmospheric pressure led to the formation of the first living cell. The first thing that must be said is that the
claim that inanimate materials can come together to form life is an
unscientific one that has not been verified by any experiment or
observation. Life is only generated from
life. Each living cell is formed by the
replication of another cell. No one in
the world has ever succeeded in forming a living cell by bringing inanimate
materials together, not even in the most advanced laboratories. The theory of evolution faces no greater
crisis than on the point of explaining the emergence of life. The reason is that organic molecules are so
complex that their formation cannot possibly be explained as being coincidental
and it is manifestly impossible for an organic cell to have been formed by
chance.” -Harun Yahya,
“The Evolution Deceit” (128-130)
How
could all the inter-connected and compartmentalized components, the cell wall,
the cell membrane, the mitochondria, proteins, DNA, RNA, ribosomes, lysosomes,
cytoplasm, vacuoles, nucleus and other cell parts magically come together and
create conscious intelligent life from unconscious dead matter? Just making one average-sized protein
molecule is already composed of 288 amino acids of 12 varying types which can
be combined 10300 power different ways! Of all those possibilities, only one forms
the desired protein molecule and there are over 600 types of proteins combined
in the smallest bacterias ever discovered.
Astronomer
Fred Hoyle compared the odds that all the multi-faceted and multi-functional
parts of a cell could coincidentally come together and create life analogous to
“a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard and assembling a Boeing 747 from the
materials therein!” Hoyle wrote
that, “If there were a basic principle of matter which somehow drove organic
systems toward life, its existence should easily be demonstrable in the
laboratory. One could, for instance,
take a swimming bath to represent the primordial soup. Fill it with any chemicals of a
non-biological nature you please. Pump
any gases over it, or through it, you please, and shine any kind of radiation
on it that takes your fancy. Let the
experiment proceed for a year and see how many of those 2,000 enzymes (proteins
produced by living cells) have appeared in the bath. I will give the answer, and so save the time
and trouble and expense of actually doing the experiment. You will find nothing at all, except possibly
for a tarry sludge composed of amino acids and other simple organic chemicals.” Even if scientists placed all the chemical
substances necessary for life in a tank, applied to them any processes of their
choice, and waited for billions of years, not a single living cell could or
would ever form.
"The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from
inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 zeros after it … It is big
enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. The beginnings of life were not random; they
must have been the product of purposeful intelligence. From my earliest training as a scientist, I
was very strongly brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with
any kind of deliberate creation. That
notion has had to be painfully shed. At
the moment, I can’t find any rational argument to knock down the view which
argues for conversion to God. We used to
have an open mind; now we realize that the only logical answer to life is
creation - and not accidental random shuffling.” -Astrobiologist Chandra Wickramasinghe
“Scientific
proofs from such branches of science as paleontology, microbiology and anatomy
reveal evolution to be a bankrupt theory. It has been stressed that evolution is
incompatible with scientific discoveries, reason and logic. Those who believe in the theory of evolution
think that a few atoms and molecules thrown into a huge vat could produce
thinking, reasoning, professors, university students, scientists, artists,
antelopes, lemon trees and carnations.
Moreover, the scientists and professors who believe in this nonsense are
educated people. That is why it is quite
justifiable to speak of the theory of evolution as ‘the most potent spell in
history.’ Never before has any other
belief or idea so taken away peoples’ powers of reason, refused to allow them
to think intelligently and logically, and hidden the truth from them as if they
had been blindfolded.” -Harun Yahya,
“The Evolution Deceit” (178-179)
Consciousness, life,
the beautiful diversity, complexity and interconnectedness of nature and the
universe simply could not be the result of some random coincidental
physical phenomenon. If the
likelihood of life forming from inanimate matter is 1 x 1040,000
power, then those are precisely the magnificent odds against which the universe
could be unintelligently designed! Even
the simple formation of DNA and RNA molecules are similarly beyond the reach of
chance to come together, equivalent to 1 x 10600 power, or 10 with
600 zeros afterwards! Such a
mathematical improbability actually so closely borders the impossible that the
word “improbable” becomes misleading.
Mathematicians who regularly work with these infinitesimally small
numbers say anything beyond 1 x 1050 powers should be considered,
for all intents and purposes, impossible.
Dr. Leslie Orgel, an associate of Francis Crick, the discoverer of
DNA wrote, “It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both
of which are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the
same time. Yet it also seems impossible
to have one without the other. And so,
at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact,
have originated by chemical means.”
Or as Turkish Evolutionist Professor Ali Demirsoy stated “the
probability of the coincidental formation of cythochrome-C, just one of the
essential proteins for life, is as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey
writing the history of humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes … Some
metaphysical powers beyond our definition must have acted in its formation.”
"Let us suppose that millions of years ago a cell was formed which
had acquired everything necessary for life, and that it duly ‘came to
life.’ The theory of evolution again
collapses at this point. For even if
this cell had existed for a while, it would eventually have died and after its
death, nothing would have remained, and everything would have reverted to where
it had started. This is because this
first living cell, lacking any genetic information, would not have been able to
reproduce and start a new generation.
Life would have ended with its death.
The genetic system does not only consist of DNA. The following things must also exist in the
same environment: enzymes to read the code on the DNA, messenger RNA to be
produced after reading these codes, a ribosome to which messenger RNA will
attach according to this code, transfer RNA to transfer the amino acids to the
ribosome for use in production, and extremely complex enzymes to carry out
numerous intermediary processes. Such an
environment cannot exist anywhere apart from a totally isolated and completely
controlled environment such as the cell, where all the essential raw materials
and energy resources exist.” -Harun
Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (170)
The
Big Bang theory is easily proven false as the nature of explosions is to
destroy, to break things down into their constituent parts, increasing chaos and
decreasing order; explosions simply do not and cannot create things, causing
disparate parts to combine into more ordered wholes as the Big Bang theory contends. Similarly, the theory of evolution is proven
false by entropy, the second law of thermodynamics. It is a fact that systems left to their own
devices tend to become corrupted, disordered and dispersed over time. All things, living or not, wear out,
deteriorate and decay. They do NOT
spontaneously come together over time, in incredibly implausible combinations
creating diverse, complex and beautiful living forms! Thus the theory of evolution is in
direct opposition to the law of entropy; Evolution supposes things become
more ordered, more structured and more complex over time, but from rust to mould to rotting corpses,
nature is everywhere at odds with such a notion. Furthermore, according to the Le Chatelier
Principle in chemistry, life could not have been formed in the sea as
evolutionists allege anyway; since the peptide bond created by amino acid
chains produces water molecules, it is not possible for such a reaction to take
place in a
hydrous environment.
"Organic matter can self-reproduce only if it exists as a fully
developed cell with all its organelles and in an appropriate environment where
it can survive, exchange materials, and get energy from its surroundings. This means that the first cell on earth was
formed ‘ all of a sudden’ together with its amazingly complex structure … What
would you think if you went out hiking in the depths of a thick forest and ran
across a brand-new car among the trees?
Would you imagine that various elements in the forest had come together
by chance over millions of years and produced such a vehicle? All the parts in the car are made of products
such as iron, copper, and rubber - the raw ingredients for which are all found
on the earth - but would this fact lead you to think that these materials had
synthesized ‘by chance’ and then come together and manufactured such a car? There is no doubt that anyone with a sound
mind would realize that the car was the product of an intelligent design - in
other words, a factory - and wonder what it was doing there in the middle of
the forest. The sudden emergence of a
complex structure in a complete form, quite out of the blue, shows that this is
the work of an intelligent agent. An
extraordinarily complex system like the cell is no doubt created by a superior
will and wisdom. In other words, it came
into existence as a Creation of God.”
-Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (170-171)
Many
facets of nature are far too complex, specialized, and perfect to ever have
arisen simply due to blind chance changes over time. For example, the eye with its various parts
and mechanisms all working together with the brain producing the sharpest,
clearest 3-D color images imaginable.
Even the most advanced cameras and plasma screens ever produced by
humans cannot provide an image as perfect in detail and clarity as our own
eyes. Charles Darwin, the originator of
the theory of evolution himself admitted that “the thought of the eye made him
cold all over!” as he knew what an impassable obstacle the eye presented for
his theory. And it is the same with ears
and audio equipment. For over a century
many thousands of researchers, scientists and engineers have been working in
factories across the world trying to produce sharper, clearer audio/video
playing and recording devices, never coming close to the capabilities and
perfection of the ear and eye.
“Look
at the book you read, your hands with which you hold it, then lift your head
and look around you. Have you ever seen
such a sharp and distinct image as this one at any other place? Even the most developed television screen
produced by the greatest television producer in the world cannot provide such a
sharp image for you. This is a
three-dimensional, colored, and extremely sharp image … No one would say that a
HI-FI or a camera came into being as a result of chance. So how can it be claimed that the
technologies that exist in the human body, which are superior even to these,
could have come into being as a result of a chain of coincidences called
evolution? It is evident that the
eye, the ear, and indeed all the other parts of the human body are products of
a very superior Creation.”
-Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (175-178)
Charles Darwin, in his “Origin of Species,” the veritable
Bible of atheist-materialists, stated that, “If my theory be true,
numberless intermediate varieties, linking most closely all of the species of
the same group together must assuredly have existed … Consequently evidence of
their former existence could be found only amongst fossil remains.” Darwin himself knew no such “transitional
forms” had been discovered and hoped that they would be found in the
future. He even admitted in his
“Difficulties on Theory” chapter that these missing intermediate forms were the
biggest stumbling-block for his theory.
He called it “the most obvious and gravest objection which can be
urged against my theory.”
“According to the theory of evolution, every living
species has emerged from a predecessor.
One species which existed previously turned into something else over
time and all species have come into being in this way. According to the theory, this transformation
proceeds gradually over millions of years.
If this were the case, then innumerable intermediate species should have
lived during the immense period of time when these transformations were
supposedly occurring. For instance,
there should have lived in the past some half-fish/half-reptile creatures which
had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already
had. Or there should have existed some
reptile/bird creatures, which had acquired some avian traits in addition to the
reptilian traits, they already possessed.
Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to
have lived in the past as, ‘transitional forms.’ If such animals had really existed, there
would have been millions, even billions, of them. More importantly, the remains of these
creatures should be present in the fossil record. The number of these transitional forms should
have been even greater than that of present animal species and their remains
should be found all over the world.”
-Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (61)
Darwin hoped that transitional forms of animal species
gradually evolving into different species would eventually be discovered at
some future time in the fossil record.
To this day, however, no such transitional forms have ever been found
anywhere in the world. Darwin’s
observations regarding natural selection and adaptation were certainly
correct. So-called “micro-evolution” of
various traits and characteristics within a species has been confirmed and
widely exists, but “macro-evolution,” the supposed transformation from one
species into a completely different species has never been observed, and no
evidence of such evolution exists anywhere in the fossil record. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist for the
British Museum of Natural History and an ardent evolutionist, even he admits that
Darwinists must concede natural selection has never been observed to actually
cause anything to evolve: “No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms
of natural selection. No one has ever
got near it and most of the current argument in neo-Darwinism is about this
question.”
“Even in the most ‘scientific’ books about evolution, the stage of
‘transition from water to land’ - one of the unexplainable points of evolution
- is given in such simplicity that they do not prove to be believable even for
children. According to evolution, life
began in water and the first developed animals on earth were fish. According to the story, one day fish species
developed the ability to climb out of water and moved on land! The theory continues that fish which chose to
live on land had feet instead of fins and lungs instead of gills! In most of the books about evolution, nobody
explains ‘why’ the transition occurred.
Even in the most ‘scientific’ sources, writers suddenly jump to
conclusions like ‘and transition from water to land occurred’ without providing
a satisfactory answer regarding how the process worked. Yet how did this transformation occur? It is obvious that a fish cannot survive out
of water for more than one or two minutes.
If, we assume that a drought really existed as claimed by evolutionists,
and fish were, for some reason, drawn to lands then what would happen to fish
even if this process lasts for ten millions of years? The answer is straight: Fish leaving the
water would inevitably die in a few moments.
Even if this process lasted for ten millions of years, the answer would
still be the same; All fish would die one by one. Nobody would dare to say: ‘Maybe after 4
million years some of the fish suddenly acquired lungs while they were trying
to survive. This would no doubt be an
illogical assertion! However that is
exactly what evolutionists claim.”
-Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (212)
The theory of evolution supposes that life somehow
originated and evolved in the sea until somehow something that had theretofore
lived only under water grew lungs and feet and started living on land! Darwinists claim fish (creatures living only
under water) turned into amphibians (creatures living on both land and water)
and then amphibians evolved into reptiles (creatures living only on land). Then they propose some reptiles evolved wings
and became birds while other reptiles evolved and became mammals. None of these transitional forms have ever
been found, however, nor could they realistically exist either. For example amphibian eggs develop only in
water whereas amniotic eggs develop only on land, so some sort of gradual
step-by-step evolution scenario is impossible since without perfect, complete
eggs a species cannot survive. Reptiles allegedly
evolving into mammals is another example of evolutionist wishful-thinking. Reptiles are cold-blooded, lay eggs, do not
suckle their young, have one middle-ear bone, three mandible bones and bodies
covered in scales, whereas mammals are warm-blooded, have live births, suckle
their young, have three middle-ear bones, one mandible, and are covered in fur
or hair - far too many distinct differences for “gradual evolution.” Reptiles evolving wings is another sheer
impossibility, as the structure of land-dwelling reptiles and air-dwelling
birds are far too different. Engin
Korur, a Turkish evolutionist admits the problem wings present to Darwin’s
theory, “The common trait of the eyes and the wings is that they can only
function if they are fully developed. In
other words a half-way developed eye cannot see; a bird with half-formed wings
cannot fly. How these organs came into
being has remained one of the mysteries
of nature that needs to be enlightened.”
“Although
it is cloaked in the guise of science, the theory of evolution is nothing but a
deceit: a deceit defended only for the benefit of materialistic philosophy; a
deceit based not on science but on brainwashing, propaganda, and fraud. The theory of evolution is a theory that
fails at the very first step. The reason
is that evolutionists are unable to explain even the formation of a single
protein. Neither the laws of probability
nor the laws of physics and chemistry offer any chance for the fortuitous
formation of life. Does it sound logical
or reasonable when not even a single chance-formed protein can exist, that
millions of such proteins combined in an order to produce the cell of a living
thing; and that billions of cells managed to form and then came together by
chance to produce living things; and that from them generated fish; and that
those that passed to land turned into reptiles, birds, and that this is how all
the millions of different species on earth were formed? They have never found a single transitional
form such as a half-fish/half-reptile or half-reptile/half-bird. Nor have they been able to prove that a
protein, or even a single amino acid molecule composing a protein, could have
formed under what they call primordial earth conditions; not even in their
elaborately-equipped laboratories have they succeeded in doing that.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit”
(214-215)
Darwin's theory is a
concept that concerns not only biology, chemistry, astronomy and metaphysics,
but actually formed the basis for new political outlooks as well. Within a very
short time, this new progressive political attitude was redefined as “Social Darwinism,” and
as many historians have suggested, Social Darwinism became the ideological
basis of fascism, communism, and eugenics.
Darwin’s ideas of “natural selection” and “survival of the fittest” were
central to the insane ideologies of many of the 20th century’s worst mass
murderers including Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Marx, and Pol Pot. Charles Darwin himself was a blatant racist
who elucidated in his book “The Descent of Man” how blacks and aborigines, due
to their inferiority to Caucasians would “be done away with by the civilized races
in time.”
Freemasonic records state that Charles Darwin’s grandfather
Erasmus Darwin was a philosopher, scientist and physician who advanced ideas on
evolution back in the 18th century.
Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. Darwin had been made a Mason in the
famous Time Immemorial Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning No. 2 of Scotland. He also maintained close connections to the
Jacobin Masons in France and Adam Weishaupt’s Illuminati. Sir Francis Darwin and Reginald Darwin, two
of his sons, were also made Masons in Tyrian Lodge No. 253 at Derby. Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls
of the Lodge but it is most likely that he, like his Grandfather, his Sons and
his “Bulldog” T.H.Huxley, was a Mason.
Charles wrote that he used to listen to his grandfather’s ideas of
evolution and was greatly influenced by them.
Erasmus was the first man to put forward the notion of evolution in
England. He was known as a “respected”
person, but he had a very dark private life and at least two illegitimate
children. Charles himself would go on to
marry his first cousin and have three children die due to complications from
inbreeding.
"Masons, thinking that Darwinism could serve their goals,
played a great role in its dissemination among the masses. As soon as Darwin’s theory was published, a
group of volunteer propagandists formed around it, the most famous of whom was
Thomas Huxley who was called Darwin’s ‘bulldog.’ Huxley ‘whose ardent advocacy of Darwinism
was the single factor most responsible for its rapid acceptance’ brought the
world’s attention to the theory of evolution in the Debate at the Oxford
University Museum in which he entered into on June 30th, 1860 with the bishop
of Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce. Huxley’s
great dedication to spreading the idea of evolution, together with his
establishment connections, is brought into further light according to the
following fact: Huxley was a member of the Royal Society, one of England’s most
prestigious scientific institutions and, like nearly all the other members of
this institution, was a senior Mason.
Other members of the Royal Society lent Darwin significant support … In
short, Darwin wasn’t acting alone; from the moment his theory was proposed, he
received the support that came from the social classes and groups whose nucleus
was made up of Masons.” -Harun
Yahya, “The Theory of Evolution Revisited”
“An important example which proves the fact that
Darwinism is one of the biggest deceptions of atheistic freemasonry is a
resolution carried in a mason meeting.
The 33rd degree Supreme Council of Mizraim Freemasonry at Paris, reveals
in its minutes its promotion of evolution as science, while they themselves
scoffed at the theory. The minutes read
as follows: ‘It is with this object in view [the scientific theory of
evolution] that we are constantly by means of our press, arousing a blind
confidence in these theories. The
intellectuals will puff themselves up with their knowledge and without any
logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available
from science, which our agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for
the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want. Do not suppose for a moment that these statements
are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism.’ Atheistic freemasonry in the United States
has picked up the resolution of Mizraim before long. New Age magazine in its March 1922 issue
stated that the kingdom of atheistic freemasonry will be established by
evolution and the development of man himself.
As seen above, the false scientific image of evolution is a deception
set in the 33rd degree atheist Masonic lodges.
Atheist masons openly admit that they will use the scientists and media
which are under their control to present this deception as scientific, which
even they find funny.” -Harun Yahya,
“The Fundamental Philosophy of Atheistic Freemasonry”
The Mimar Sinan journal published by the Turkish Great Freemasonry
Lodge has openly discussed their mission to use Darwinism to overthrow religion
and belief in God. One article
mentioned, “Today the only valid scientific theory accepted both by most
civilized countries and underdeveloped ones remains to be Darwinism. However, neither the church nor other
religions have collapsed yet. The legend
of Adam and Eve is still being taught as religious teachings in holy books.” In other words, it seems one of the main goals
of modern Masons, besides convincing people of the ball-Earth and Big Bang, is
to abolish the biblical creation story and replace it with their godless myth
of blind chance evolution. Just like
Copernicus never claimed to have any new or special evidence for his
heliocentric theory, Darwin never claimed to have any verifiable scientific evidence
proving his evolution theory, yet here we are 150 years later, no closer to a
proof of either, but with the vast majority of indoctrinated sheeple convinced
they are monkey-men hanging from a spinning ball!
"When we look at the Western media carefully, we frequently come
across news dwelling on the theory of evolution. Leading media organizations, and well-known
and ‘respectable’ magazines periodically bring this subject up. When their approach is examined, one gets the
impression that this theory is an absolutely proven fact leaving no room for
discussion. Ordinary people reading this
kind of news naturally start to think that the theory of evolution is a fact as
certain as any law of mathematics. They
print headlines in big fonts: ‘According to Time magazine, a new fossil that
completes the gap in the fossil chain has been found’; or ‘Nature indicates
that scientists have shed light on the final issues of evolutionary
theory.’ The finding of ‘the last
missing link of the evolution chain’ means nothing because there is not a
single thing proven about evolution. In
short, both the media and academic circles, which are at the disposal of
anti-religionist power-centers, maintain an entirely evolutionist view and they
impose this on society. This imposition
is so effective that it has in time turned evolution into an idea that is never
to be rejected. Denying evolution is
seen as being contradictory to science and fundamental realities.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (210)
“The
information we have considered throughout this book has shown us that the
theory of evolution has no scientific basis, and that, on the contrary,
evolutionist claims conflict with scientific facts. In other words, the force that keeps
evolution alive is not science. The
theory of evolution is maintained by some ‘scientists,’ but behind it there is
another influence at work. This other
influence is materialist philosophy.
Materialist philosophy is one of the oldest beliefs in the world, and
assumes the existence of matter as its basic principle. According to this view, matter has always
existed, and everything that exists consists of matter. This makes belief in a Creator impossible, of
course, because if matter has always existed, and if everything consists of matter,
then there can be no suprematerial Creator who created it.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (202)
The
fact of the matter is evolution is, was, and always has been a foregone
conclusion by people looking for any answer other than God. When you metaphysically exclude the existence
of an intelligent creative consciousness behind the creation of the material
world, the only answer left is random happenstance! Everything must be the result of coincidence,
chance and circumstance once you have excluded the possibility of a supreme
intelligent creator. But no matter how
diligently it is denied, the truth remains: you simply are not some cosmic
accident, not the result of random happenstance, chance or coincidence, your
eyes, your ears, your feelings, your life and consciousness are all the result
of the most supremely intelligent design!
My previous book Spiritual Science is a 284-page refutation of
materialist science and philosophy which proves far beyond any reasonable doubt
that atheistic materialism is an invalid, untenable, destructive philosophy,
and that consciousness and intelligence existed before and beyond all space,
time and matter.
Malcolm Muggeridge, an atheist philosopher and supporter of evolution
for 60 years finally admitted before his death that, “I myself am convinced
that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied,
will be one of the great jokes in the history books in the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and
dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it
has.”
“According to these professors, a number of simple
chemical substances first came together and formed a protein - which is no more
possible than a randomly scattered collection of letters coming together to
form a poem. Then, other coincidences
led to the emergence of other proteins.
These then also combined by chance in an organized manner. Not just proteins, but DNA, RNA, enzymes,
hormones, and cell organelles, all of which are very complex structures within
the cell, coincidentally happened to emerge and come together. As a result of these billions of
coincidences, the first cell came into being … If you put a carved stone or
wooden idol in front of these people and told them, ‘Look, this idol created
this room and everything in it’ they would say that was utterly stupid and
refuse to believe it. Yet despite that
they declare the nonsense that ‘The unconscious process known as chance gradually
brought this world and all the billions of wonderful living things in it into
being’ to be the greatest scientific explanation. In short, these people regard chance as a
god, and claim that it is intelligent, conscious and powerful enough to create
living things and all the sensitive balances in the universe.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (32)
One of the first frauds in the history of Darwinism, known as
“recapitulation theory,” and heralded as undeniable “proof of evolution,” was
an idea proposed and propagated by a racist eugenicist Professor named Ernst
Haeckel in the late 19th century. A
contemporary and friend of Charles Darwin and Thomas “Bulldog” Huxley, Haeckel
postulated that human (and other animal) embryos experience a miniature form of
the entire evolutionary impulse during their development in the womb,
displaying first characteristics of fish, then reptile, and lastly mammalian or
human. It has long been eliminated from
scientific literature, but many people and popular sources still unknowingly
quote and believe in Haeckel’s fraudulent work.
Several popular magazines and school textbooks as recently as the 1990s,
over a century after being exposed, were still publishing Haeckel’s hoaxed
pictures and recapitulation theory as science fact!
“It
has since been proven that this theory is completely bogus. It is now known that the ‘gills’ that
supposedly appear in the early stages of the human embryo are in fact the
initial phases of the middle-ear canal, parathyroid, and thymus. The part of the embryo that was likened to
the ‘egg yolk pouch’ turns out to be a pouch that produces blood for the
infant. The part that had been
identified as a ‘tail’ by Haeckel and his followers is in fact the backbone, which
resembles a tail only because it takes shape before the legs do. Another interesting aspect of
‘recapitulation’ was Ernst Haeckel himself, a faker who falsified his drawings
in order to support the theory he advanced.
Haeckel’s forgeries purported to show that fish and human embryos resembled
one another. When he was caught out, the
only defense he offered was that other evolutionists had committed similar
offences!” -Harun Yahya, “The
Evolution
Deceit” (199-200)
Haeckel
was charged with fraud by five professors and convicted by a university court
at Jena where he admitted that several of his drawings were forgeries, that he
was merely filling in missing links where evidence was thin, and that hundreds
of his contemporaries were guilty of the same charge! During the trial he said; “After this
compromising confession of forgery I should be obliged to consider myself
condemned and annihilated if I had not the consolation of seeing side by side
with me in the prisoners’ dock hundreds of fellow culprits, among them many of
the most trusted observers and most esteemed biologists. The great majority of all the diagrams in the
best biological textbooks, treatises and journals would incur in the same
degree the charge of forgery, for all of them are inexact, and are more or less
doctored, schematized and constructed.”
What
an admission! Not only did Haeckel
confess his own forgeries, but he admitted that there were hundreds of other
scientific fraudsters similarly doctoring findings in the best biological
textbooks, treatises and journals (several of which will be examined in this
chapter). As it turns out, Haeckel had
simply copied and printed the same human embryo pictures several times over
claiming each were various other animal embryos with exact parallels, when in
fact the parallels do not exist, and the pictures were copies he knowingly and
intentionally made to suit his recapitulation idea.
“To
support his theory, Haeckel, whose knowledge of embryology was self-taught,
faked some of his evidence. He not only
altered his illustrations of embryos but also printed the same plate of an
embryo three times, and labeled one a human, the second a dog and the third a
rabbit ‘to show their similarity.’”
-Malcolm Bowden, “Ape-Men: Fact or Fallacy?”
“This is one of the worst cases of scientific fraud. It’s shocking to find that somebody one
thought was a great scientist was deliberately misleading. It makes me angry … What Haeckel did was to
take a human embryo and copy it, pretending that the salamander and the pig and
all the others looked the same at the same stage of development. They don’t … These are fakes.” -Dr. Michael Richardson, The Times London,
Aug. 11, 1997
For the past 150 years, evolutionist scientists have been
working diligently to propagandize the public into believing that modern humans
are descended from ancient apes. The
final and most difficult theoretical leap for the theory of evolution is this
supposed million-year transition from ape to human. The utter impossibility of “evolving”
abilities like bipedality, erect spinal columns, and complex linguistic skills
has been debated since the theory was first presented, but such obstacles will
never stop die-hard evolutionists set on discovering (or inventing!) a
believable monkey-man transitional species.
The
first of these convenient evolutionary “discoveries” was the “Neanderthal Man”
found in the Neander Valley of Germany in 1856, just in time for the release of
Darwin’s Origin of Species. To this day,
reconstructed drawings of hairy ape-like “Neanderthal” men are depicted in
scholarly journals and school textbooks and claimed to be a missing
evolutionary link. The fact is, however,
that all so-called Neanderthal remains have never been shown to be any more
different from modern humans than an Asian from a Caucasian, or an Inuit from
an Aborigine. Also the skull size shows
its brain was actually 13% larger than the average brain of modern man, making
it impossible to be an intermediary between man and ape. Even Time magazine in 1971 proclaimed the primitiveness
of Neanderthal to be unwarranted, that he could walk the street today
unrecognized, one writer even commenting that historians of the future may “declare
us all insane for not detecting and refuting
this incredible blunder with adequate determination.”
One
of the main proponents pushing Neanderthal Man as an authentic species nowadays
is Reiner Protsch, a German professor who dated the fossils at 36,000 years old
allowing them to fit perfectly in the evolutionist’s timeline. In 2005, however, Protsch was forced to
retire in disgrace by a panel of Frankfurt University heads who determined he
had “fabricated data and plagiarized the work of his colleagues over the
past 30 years.” The once-renowned
“carbon-dating expert” has presently been completely ostracized from the
scientific community. It has since been
determined that all Neanderthal skeletal remains are no more than a few
thousand years old, some only a few hundred!
They have also found modern human DNA in the bones, that their brain capacity
was 13% larger than the modern average, their height 5’9” comparable to our
average, and they had advanced tools, buried their dead and enjoyed art!
University
of Berlin Professor Rudolf Virchow, Ernst Haeckel’s former professor and the
“father of modern pathology” back in 1872 concluded the original “Neanderthal” remains
were simply that of an unfortunate homo sapiens who had suffered childhood
rickets, adult arthritis, and was victim to several damaging blows to the
head. Erik Trinkaus, a paleoanthropologist
from New Mexico University concluded his examination stating, “Detailed
comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal remains with those of modern humans have
shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates
locomotor, manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abilities inferior to
those of modern humans.”
In 1891-92, the next ape-man “discovery” was found in Java, Indonesia
by Eugene Dubois, who “coincidentally” happened to be a student and apprentice
of evolutionist hoaxster Ernst Haeckel! Dubois
found a skullcap, a leg bone, a jaw fragment and three teeth, from which was
reconstructed the ape-like “Java Man.” Within
10 years of its discovery, Java Man was the main subject of over 80 evolution books
and articles. It was given the
“scientific name,” of “Anthropopithecus erectus,” and later changed to
“Pithecanthropus erectus” and finally “Homo erectus” undoubtedly for
super-official pseudo-scientific reasons.
“Java
man was discovered by a Dutchman. I’m a
little embarrassed by that because I’m a Dutchman myself. His name was Eugene Dubois. The bones were found in 1891-92 on the
Indonesian Island of Java in Southeast Asia along the banks of the Solo
River. And there was an interesting
assortment. He found a leg bone, a
skullcap, a jaw fragment and three teeth.
And that’s what he concocted Java man from. Interestingly enough some of the teeth were
old and some young. The bones belonged
to ape, female and male. It was an interesting
conglomeration and the reason that people didn’t catch on to it is because the
find of Dubois was kept from scholars for about 30 years. He also withheld the discovery of modern
human remains, which were found in the same stratum as Java man. Of course, that would have ruined his claims
that Java man was the ancestor of modern day humans. Finally, enough pressure was placed on him
that the actual bones were allowed to be examined and the discrepancies were
found. And eventually, enlightened America
as well as the world found out that this was a hoax. Unfortuantely hoaxes die hard. [Recently] Time
Magazine ran a cover story entitled “How Man Became Man” and starts off
ridiculing Christians and Creationists then goes on to present Java man as though
it were fact.” -Hank Hanegraaff,
“The Face that Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution”
“Java Man’s” teeth were found to be of different ages and
the bones a mixture of human and ape, with a giant gibbon skull! Rudolph Virchow, Haeckel’s own professor and the
foremost pathology expert of his time stated, “In my opinion this creature
was an animal, a giant gibbon, in fact.
And the thigh bone has not the slightest connection with the skull.” He and many others have concluded the thigh bone
is quite clearly human while the skullcap and teeth belonged to a
primate.
In 1912 a doctor and
paleo-anthropologist named Charles Dawson claimed to have found a jawbone and
cranial fragment of an ape-man transitional form in a pit in Piltdown,
England. It was alleged to be 500,000
years old and was displayed as absolute proof of human evolution in museums
across the world. For the next 40 years,
scores of “scientific” articles, artist reconstructions, and over 500 doctoral
theses were written about “Piltdown man.”
Objections and criticisms were raised immediately by contemporaries like
Arthur Keith but managed to be mitigated by Dawson until 1953 when tests proved
conclusively that the Piltdown skull was actually human and only a few hundred
years old, while the lower protruding jaw was from a recently deceased
orangutan!
Investigators found that Dawson had artificially worn down
the orangutan jaw, and that the “primitive tools” discovered alongside the
fossils were imitations Dawson had sharpened with steel implements! Dawson also filled the molar surfaces of the
teeth to more resemble those of man, and stained all the fossils with potassium
dichromate to give them an antiquated appearance. The stains quickly disappeared when dipped in
acid however. Wilfred Le Gros Clark, a
member of Joseph Weiner’s team who uncovered the forgery, stated that, “the
evidences of artificial abrasion immediately sprang to the eye. Indeed so obvious did they seem it may well
be asked, how was it that they had escaped notice before?” Within days, Piltdown man was removed from
the British Museum where it had been on display for four decades.
Since conclusively being proven a hoax in 1953 many of
Dawson’s other paleontological “finds” have also proven to be fakes or
planted. In 2003, Dr. Miles Russell of
Bournemouth University published the results of an investigation into Dawson’s
antiquarian collection concluding that at least 38 specimens were clear fakes, noting
that “Dawson’s entire academic career appears to have been built upon
deceit, sleight of hand, fraud and deception, the ultimate gain being
international recognition.”
The next fraudulent attempt at creating and propagating a
supposed ape-man transitional form was carried out in 1922 by Henry Fairfield
Osborn. Co-founder of the American
Eugenics Society, President of the White Supremacist Pioneer Fund and director
of the American Museum of Natural History, Osborn declared that he had been
sent an anomalous tooth found in Snake Brook, Nebraska, which had
characteristics of both ape and man! He
determined that it came from the Pliocene period of ancient history, from the
transitional species “Pithecanthropus erectus,” and affectionately labeled the
tooth’s owner “Nebraska Man.”
“Nebraska man was also immediately given a ‘scientific name,’
Hesperopithecus haroldcooki. Many
authorities gave Osborn their support.
Based on this single tooth, reconstructions of the Nebraska man’s head
and body were drawn. Moreover, Nebraska
man was even pictured along with his wife and children, as a whole family in a
natural setting.” -Harun Yahya, “The
Evolution Deceit” (95)
Once
“Nebraska Man” made the media rounds of popular publications and the pliable
public was sufficiently propagandized, the story disappeared until 1928 when
William Bryan and William Gregory had the opportunity to independently examine
the tooth. Their investigations both
conclusively found that the tooth did not belong to a man or ape, but was
actually from an extinct species of wild American pig called Presthennops! After William Gregory published his article,
“Hesperopithecus: Apparently Not an Ape Nor a Man,” in Science magazine all
drawings and models of “Nebraska Man” and his “family” were quickly removed
from evolutionist publications.
Henry Osborn himself was forced to concede that Nebraska
Man, “Hesperopithecus haroldcooki,” the supposed example of the “Pliocene
Pithecanthropus erectus” and his whole imaginary family were completely
fictional fabrications. He never
admitted to intentional fraud (and why would he?), but as an ardent
evolutionist, eugenicist and white supremacist, a level of confirmation bias
was likely. Osborn was even such a
sadistic racist that he was quoted during a national debate unabashedly saying
of WWI Army intelligence tests that; “I believe those tests were worth what
the war cost, even in human life … We have learned once and for all that the
Negro is not like us.”
“After Darwin advanced the claim with his book The Descent of Man
that man evolved from ape-like living beings, he started to seek fossils to
support this contention. However, some
evolutionists believed that ‘half-man half-ape’ creatures were to be found not
only in the fossil record, but also alive in various parts of the world. In the early 20th century, these pursuits for
‘living transitional links’ led to unfortunate incidents, one of the cruelest
of which is the story of a Pygmy by the name of Ota Benga. Ota Benga was captured in 1904 by an
evolutionist researcher in the Congo. In
his own tongue, his name meant ‘friend.’ He had a wife and two children. Chained and caged like an animal, he was taken
to the USA where evolutionist scientists displayed him to the public in the St.
Louis World Fair along with other ape species and introduced him as ‘the
closest transitional link to man.’ Two
years later they took him to the Bronx Zoo in New York and there they exhibited
him under the denomination of ‘ancient ancestors of man’ along with a few
chimpanzee, a gorilla named Dinah, and an orangutan called Dohung. Dr. William Hornaday, the zoo’s evolutionist
director gave long speeches on how proud he was to have this exceptional
‘transitional form’ in his zoo and treated caged Ota Benga as if he were an
ordinary animal. Unable to bear the
treatment he was subjected to, Ota Benga eventually committed suicide. Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Ota Benga… These
scandals demonstrate that evolutionist scientists do not hesitate to employ any
kind of unscientific method to prove their theories.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (96-97)
In 1927 Davidson Black
declared he had discovered five crushed skulls and several teeth near Beijing
belonging to an ancient ape-man species now widely known as “Peking Man.” Somewhere between 1941-1945 all the original
bones were mysteriously “lost,” however, leaving only a few plaster casts left
to examine! At the same site where this
supposed “missing link” was found, there were also found the remains of 10
fully human skeletons who quarried nearby limestone, built fires and left
behind a variety of tools. Many
scientists now believe the tools were used on the Peking Man rather than by
them. The back of the skulls were all
bashed in and in that part of the world, monkey brains are a delicacy, so it is
likely that Peking Man were actually Peking apes, and they were man’s meal, not
man’s ancient ancestor.
In 1974 Donald Johansson discovered “Lucy” a three-foot tall
supposedly three-million year-old “Australopithicine” in Ethiopia. Widely publicized as our oldest direct human
ancestor, Lucy made the usual rounds of scientific magazine journals and school
textbooks. Don Johansson modestly
claimed that Lucy was “the most important find made by anyone in the history
of the entire human race,” and the media heralded him a hero. He was promoted from assistant professor to
receiving his own Institute for Human Biology at Berkley. During all this time he never allowed
scientists to examine Lucy’s bones until 1982, eight years later. Since then, and as more “Australopithecine”
skeletons have been found and examined, however, many leading evolutionists
agree that Lucy is simply an extinct type of ape, similar to modern pygmy
chimpanzees and nothing more. They may
have walked slightly more upright than most apes, but were not bipedal or
erect, could not talk, spent most time in trees, and walked on all fours.
Lord
Solly Zuckerman and Professor Charles Oxnard did 15 years of research on
Australopithecines along with a team of five specialists coming to the
conclusion that all the various specimens of Australopithecus they examined
were only an ordinary ape genus and definitely not bipedal. The French Science and Life magazine ran the
cover story in May 1999 “Goodbye Lucy” writing about how “Lucy” the most famous
fossil of Australopithecus was not the root of the human race and needs to be
removed from our supposed family tree. However, even now in 2014 a movie named “Lucy”
has just been released by Masonic “Universal Pictures” where the Lucy ape-woman
fraud is still treated as scientific
fact throughout the entire movie.
In
1982 a skull fragment found in the Spanish town of Orce was hailed to be the
oldest fossilized human remain ever found in Eurasia! “Orce man” was supposedly a 17 year old
ape-man who lived between 900,000 - 1,600,000 years ago, and was presented to
the world with the usual reconstructed drawings showing a young, hairy man-ape
teenager. In 1983, however, a team of
scientists from France concluded that the skull fragment was actually from a
four-month old donkey! A three-day scientific
symposium had been scheduled so experts could examine and discuss the bone, but
was immediately cancelled after the French investigation; embarrassed Spanish
officials sent out 500 letters to the would-be attendees apologizing. After more conclusive tests The Daily
Telegraph on May 14, 1984 carried the headline “Ass Taken For Man.”
Later
in 1984, Kemoya Kimeu in a team led by paleoanthropologist Richard Leakey,
discovered “Turkana Boy,” at Nariokotome near Lake Turkana, Kenya. Turkana Boy was proclaimed to be a pre-teen
boy from 1.5-1.6 million years ago and is now regarded as the most complete
early human skeleton ever found. Much
like Neanderthal Man, however, Turkana Boy or “Narikotome Homo erectus,” is no
different from modern man. American
paleoanthropologist Alan Walker said, “I doubt the average pathologist could
tell the difference between the fossil skeleton and that of a modern human.” He wrote that he laughed upon first seeing it
because “it looked so much like a Neanderthal.”
Turkana Boy was bipedal, with arms and legs of human proportions, an
upright skeletal structure, comparable in height, cranial size, and development
rate of modern humans. Even the
discovering team-leader Richard Leakey stated that the difference between this
specimen of “Homo erectus” and modern man are no more pronounced than simple racial
variances: “The shape of the skull, the degree of protrusion of the face,
the robustness of the brows and so on… These differences are probably no more
pronounced than we see today between the separate geographical races of modern
humans. Such biological variation arises
when populations are geographically separated from each other for significant
lengths of time.”
So,
when seen for what they really are, all the supposed ape-men discoveries and
reconstructions are nothing but frauds and fantasies. Neanderthal Man was just an ordinary man,
Java Man and Piltdown Man were composed of human and ape bones, Nebraska Man
was actually a pig, Peking Man was actually a man’s meal, Lucy was just a monkey,
Orce Man was a donkey, and Turkana Boy was just a boy!
“Reconstruction can be explained as drawing a picture or
constructing a model of a living thing based on a single bone - sometimes only
a fragment - that has been unearthed.
The ‘ape-men’ we see in newspapers, magazines, or films are all
reconstructions. The fossils that are
claimed to be evidence for the human evolution scenario are in fact products of
fraud. For more than 150 years, not even
a single fossil to prove evolution has been found. As a matter of fact, the reconstructions
(drawings or models) of the fossil remains made by the evolutionists are
prepared speculatively precisely to validate the evolutionary thesis. David R. Pilbeam, an anthropologist from
Harvard, stresses this fact when he says: ‘At least in paleoanthropology, data
are still so sparse that theory heavily influences interpretations. Theories have, in the past, clearly reflected
our current ideologies instead of the actual data.’ Since people are highly
effected by visual information, these reconstructions best serve the purpose of
evolutionists, which is to convince people that these reconstructed creatures
really existed in the past.” -Harun
Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (90)
All the many models, drawings, cartoons, mannequins, and movies made
involving various “ape-men” are complete fiction and fabrication because no one
can actually accurately determine the outward appearance of an animal based
solely on bone structure. Soft tissue,
which vanishes quickly after death and is responsible for the look of one’s
eyes, ears, nose, lips, hair, eyebrows, skin etc., totally depends on the
imagination of the person reconstructing them.
Earnest A. Hooten of Harvard University stated, “To attempt to
restore the soft parts is an even more hazardous undertaking. The lips, the eyes, the ears, and the nasal
tip leave no clues on the underlying bony parts. You can with equal facility model on a Neanderthaloid
skull the features of a chimpanzee or the lineaments of a philosopher. These alleged restorations of ancient types
of man have very little if any scientific value and are likely only to mislead
the public… So put not your trust in reconstructions.”
“There is no concrete fossil evidence to support the
‘ape-man’ image, which is unceasingly promulgated by the media and evolutionist
academic circles. With brushes in their
hands, evolutionists produce imaginary creatures, nevertheless, the fact that
these drawings correspond to no matching fossils constitutes a serious problem
for them. One of the interesting methods
they employ to overcome this problem is to ‘produce’ the fossils they cannot
find. Piltdown Man, which may be the
biggest scandal in the history of science, is a typical example of this method.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit”
(93)
The
current evolutionist ape-to-human transitional theory goes “Australophithecus,”
- “Homo habilis,” - “Homo erectus” - “Homo sapiens.” Australophithecus, which means “Southern
Ape,” has been proven to be nothing but an extinct ape which closely resembles
many modern chimpanzees in height, arm and leg length, skull shape, teeth,
mandibular structure, and many other details.
Homo habilis, a hypothetical classification created in the 1960s by
Turkana Boy team-leader Richard Leakey was what evolutionists deemed necessary
to exist between Australophithecus and Homo erectus, because the jump was far
too drastic. There needed to be a
species of ape-man with a larger cranial capacity that could walk upright and
use tools.
Serendipitously for his career, fossils unearthed in the late 1980s
were deemed Homo habilis, and Leakey was regarded a scientific genius! That is until his contemporaries Bernard Wood
and C. Loring Brace determined the Homo habilis arms were too long, legs were
too short, and skeletal structure too ape-like to be anything but an ape. Their fingers and toes were that of
tree-climbers, and their jaws and cranial capacities were comparable to modern
apes. American anthropologist Holly
Smith in 1994 concluded Homo habilis was not Homo, or human, at all, but simply
an ape just like Australopithecus. She
stated that, “Restricting analysis of fossils to specimens satisfying these
criteria, patterns of dental development of gracile australopithecines and Homo
habilis remain classified with African apes.
Those of Homo erectus and Neanderthals are classified with humans.”
So
Australopithecus and Homo habilis, the first two classifications, are both
actually fully ape, while Homo erectus and Homo sapiens, the second two
classifications, are in fact fully human and comparable to modern man, with
variances no greater than the natural variances of race and genetics. So even after 150 years of “discoveries”
evolutionists are no closer to finding a true “transitional species” existing
between ape and man, and no closer to proving their theory. Nor can they answer, how could apes develop
bipedality, human arm/leg length ratios, erect spinal columns and complex
linguistic skills? If humans evolved
from apes, why do apes still exist? Why
don’t any of these supposed transitional forms still exist now, and where are
true examples in the fossil record?
“The
evolutionists wrote the scenario of human evolution by arranging some of the
ape skulls that suited their purpose in an order from the smallest to the
biggest and scattering the skulls of some extinct human races among them. According to this scenario, men and today’s
apes have common ancestors. These
creatures evolved in time and some of them became the apes of today while
another group that followed another branch of evolution became the men of
today. However, all the paleontological,
anatomical and biological findings have demonstrated that this claim of
evolution is as fictitious and invalid as all the others. No sound or real evidence has been put
forward to prove that there is a relationship between man and ape, except
forgeries, distortions, and misleading drawings and comments. The fossil record indicates to us that
throughout history, men have been men and apes have been apes.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (98)
16 comments:
http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/hurricane-matthew-florida-braces-for-storm-as-officials-warn-residents-to-leave-before-its-too-late/news-story/782d9f82cf6cc7bf629ec258975f82ff
Thank you for all your work, you have brought me to my senses and broken the hold they had.....
please take a look at this photo on the website above...they are so sure of themselves as to now simply mock us.
Val
Perfect timing. Perfect presentation. Just what your readers needed, especially those who were stunned by your last post of "Jesus never existed." Your latest offering is salve for the wound of souls of the Abrahamic religions who are now trying to free themselves as they mourn what they once thought was the truth. If they can get their cognitive dissonance out of the way that is. It is ok to cry. I did. The tears fell as I took out my shovel to scrape away each stubborn layer. Tears can soften the ground through which you must dig to find the way out. I still have children in the indoctrination centers known as American Public Schools. I was fed the same evolution lies they are presently. With valuable "curriculum" from the "Eric Dubay School of Thought, I am helping them to learn to discern the lies from the truth. Your latest post will free those disciples from the church of Darwin. Will they have the courage to leave the temple?
All of the BS "Evilution" is being taught as fact in American schools today. How do I know? My kids come home with these textbooks filled with crap. The next time we get the opportunity I will have my kids use the sources mentioned at Atlantean Conspiracy and lets see what kind of grades they get from the unenlightened. Most likely their GPA will suffer. Oh well. What is a piece of paper diploma from being taught lies worth these days? Sad fact is it will continue whenI (I should say if) they go to college. I don't know if they want to be 80 grand in debt wasting so much time being forced to learn bogus crap..Oh but learning about and believing what "they" teach you are 2 separate things if you think about it, AND if you think for yourself.
I mentioned that we are not living on a spinning ball earth to someone the other day, (I have stopped saying flat earth it doesn't get me anywhere) and they asked me where I get my information from. When I mention Eric Dubay I immediately get a load of emails with links of interviews of the disinfo specialists mocking flat earth and saying Eric comes from a freemason family. "He is 33 years old" my friends say." Don't you know that is code for freemason?" I just laugh. Happy Birthday Eric! I see that you are 34 now that should shut them up! Actually I am pretty sure they won't they will just find something else from some obscure shill to discredit your work. Then they send me links of debunking the flat earth that ALL use NASA to prove their heliocentric nonsense. Then I shoot them back saying that NASA is nonsense with the photo of the curtain rod duck tape contraption they say they went to the moon in. My friends spit nails at me over all this. (some don't believe we went to the moon but they believe NASA's fake images when it comes to the flat earth.What the fig?) All of this is because nails are spit by the truckload at the truth from disinfo folks all over the place and regurgitated by those I know who cannot untangle themselves from this mess over topics they are unwilling to deal with. ( hence this current post on evolution and also the post prior Jesus never existed.) My Christian friends are all over the Evolution post but they are crucifying the Jesus never existed post. Eric puts it all out there because it is all connected. You cannot ignore one damn piece of this puzzle no matter how uncomfortable it makes you feel. Human behavior is all about pain avoidance however. The dark side knows this all too well.
Peace, Mary Martha
You always leave the best comments, thanks so much Mary Martha
Great work as always, Eric. Your material has been life changing to say the least.
Reading about your background in the conspiracy community reminded me of myself not so many years ago, sitting in that dark room, spending countless hours pouring over InfoWars articles and researching everything Jones spoke about. But then life happened.
Thankfully, your work has reignited my passion for Truth and has pulled me out of a downward spiral of depression. Hell, I'm even vegan now and feeling much better as result. Also, your Goyim Revolution chant is top notch! Thanks again for everything and take care of yourself.
I am glad this is moderated as I would like your comments on a webpage I built. Most of the material you are familiar with, a lot not so much I wager.
Anyway, www.veritasmc.org/flatearth.html is the page. I have an e,mail on it (in the middle) if you care to respond.
Thanks,
Luc
Thanks for the information.
I am returning to this knowledge after being led to it in the past and rejecting it as one does in one's programming, but i have found that when really and truthfully searching for knowledge, it will repeatedly "slap you in the head" until you take notice.
When I picture the earth as a car and us inside being the earth as our seat and the atmosphere the glass around us I can see us spinning with the earth.As in a car, if you drop something inside while in motion it simply drops as if standing still. If you drop the same item outside the car it drops downward but at the same time it is traveling at the same speed as the car until it slows to a stop. In my mind at the moment this theory is what explains to me how planes fly and do not leave the earth. what I can't explain is what stops the plane from flying out the window. Maybe you could take the time to debunk my theory. The globe does seem to show that the plane will fly out the window unless constant downward changes as you have stated before, it's the car theory that has my mind locked.
I totally get all of it, and spread the word as much as possible. However, one "clever clogs" responded with the question, "if there is no gravity, why do things fall downwards and not sideways"? I'm not even sure that it is a sensible question, but I didn't have the answer.
I bought your book Eric, so watch out for mine next year, called Cosmosis : Inter-dimensional Experiences. I have seen the Sun change shape from a "ball" to a "doughnut" that surrounded a mountain. I thought that you would be interested to know that such an event really happened, and I would be thrilled if you commented on it. Discovering the flat earth this Summer was perfect timing for my book, and I have revised certain passages. Thank you so much. Day.
So just a thought, but I think the northern lights, prove without a doubt we live on a flat plane. On a globe there would also be southern lights but you've never heard of those have ypu? How can charged particles be making them lights if its not 93 million miles away? But there is a supposed south pole but no lights? How does that work? It don't, not on a globe anyway. Just think about it. If you want an idea of what the lights are then you need to watch QuasiLuminous on YouTube. He's a little nuts but it's kinda funny to me but truly interesting. Check him out. At the very least it will be entertaining lol. Let me know what yall think about the lights at the very least. Flat earth for life!!! Drop the truth where ever you find it.
Hey eric I just got TOS Deletion when attempting to open IFERS - I'm sure you're aware and have had much worse things occur. But this is outrageous - Google/Internet are now the Free Speech Police? FASCISM.
REGARDS,
Dale Peters
following thread was "deleted"
http://ifers.boards.net/post/11341/thread
That we have been lied to, are traumatized and programmed is beyond dispute, its obvious to the few sane deprogrammed, that the official round earth story is full of holes, if not completly ridiculous, as most fairy tales told by the elite, however the flat earth theory is true as it turns out, but not as many civilizations before 1500 believed.
The sun and moon, are small kenetic energy spheres about 3000 miles up in the exosphere, with out atmosphere there would be no life on earth.,atmosphere is divided into four layers: troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere, and thermosphere this is where light and heat is created by the kenetic energy of the sun and moon.
my japanees teacher showed me a copy of a book that came from the secret libary of the japanees emperor,just one of the many things hidden from us ,not only is the lake flat where we all live there was a time when people became one million years old.
We all live in a flat gigantic salt water lake ,on a planet that is much i mean much bigger than what we think the "know" round earth is, and our lake is only part of many different ecosystems on this gigantic planet ,many extinct races like the mayas, disapeard ,no they simply went to another part of the planet ,atlantis probably excist on another part of this gigantic planet ,this would explain the many different "alien"races from other parts of the planet, man of 3 meter tall .elfs, hobbits, trolls, orks, real humans etc ,maybe neandertals are still living on other parts of the planet, tolkien probably describes the civilizations living on other parts of this enormous planet ,he was a high freemason they know the truth at that level, but dont take my word for it use your imangination and common sense and explore the possibilities of an earth that is 500 times bigger or more than we thought it was ,
thanks eric for posting my point of vieuw ,the flat earth as invisioned does not answer all the questions, everything has an answer and a flat disk does not answer many questions but a gigantic planet that is stationary and with polaris creates a vortex and our know star system resolves around them, held together by the ether that holds our know star system together does ,evverything else is usless speculation that only drains one of enenrgy.
We are dealing with that immensity out there. To turn that magnificence out there into reasonableness doesn't do anything for you. Here, surrounding us, is eternity itself. To engage in reducing it to a manageable nonsense is petty and outright disastrous.
we humans can see in optimal condition 400 kilometer on top of mount everest, we really have no reference point to what it means to be 150 million miles away, our sun ,we have to believe their word for it ,and as far as we can see they have been lying to us since they invented all this around 1500 ,i dont think at that time they where as sophisticated in thier lying as they are today,with all this thechnology at their disposal,maybe in their ignorance they even believed all this nonsense and kept telling the lie when they found out is was untrue ,their whole univers including god is based on this model ,it would seriously disturb thier power plays,
we do know that the know univers beyong 20000 kilometer or so is dark and cold,so how light and heat suppositly travels 150 million kilometers true dark cold space is something to think about to get an idea of the dept of the lies we are being told ,
all compasses point north, that does work ,pointing north you will always go in circles going west or east on the flat lake to where you want to go, south is the opposite of north ,but the compass needdle does not point to the south,the north pool anybody can go to ,the south pool no planes ever fly over and is off limits by international treaty.
and no one in a boat or plane wants to go anywhere near the south pool ,100 degrees below zero. and there is nothing to see just snow and ice ,apparently for many, many thousands of miles untill you get to the next ecosystem on this gigantic planet.
but nobody wants to try this, admiral bird did before he was told to back off ,he did say there is alot space as big as the US as far as he could tell and that was just in one direction where he landed ,that was 1947 way before the sophisticated technology we have today,in an intervieuw i have seen, i saw a scared man that was obviously told to back off, after the first expedition on his own, two secret military expeditions followed ,than the UN that has the flat earth/lake in its logo ,got everybody to sign a treaty that the south pole is off limits ,nobody has ever went there again ,unless they are part of a goverment /military operation, they wanted to make sure that in the future with all the sophisticated equipment we have today no one went exploring and came up with qeustions they have no "rational" convinient answers for.
to me thats sounds very exciting ,it opens up all kinds of possibilties and explains many mysteries over the last millions of years ,because as i understand it we cant leave this planet never have and never will at least not in physical form,space travel is simply for many obvious reasons, at least to any sane deprogrammed thinking human, not possible ,that means anything in physical form also so called aliens, so they must have been here allready,our planes can go for thousands of miles but who in his right mind wants to fly over the southpole for a thousand miles and find out there is still much more land and no fuel to go back, and anyway its off limits ,but a more advanced earth bound flying disk that does not use fossil fuel but some other form of propulsion system can ,there the alien problem solved ,visiters from other parts of our planet .
the elite of this lake and the elite on other parts of this planet dont want us to know the truth, and they really went to town around 1500 and invented our solar system, and the whole univers, big bang and god while they where at it , and "space" travel in recent years ,the whole "know"solar system travels around this neck of the "know" galaxy at 828000 kilometers per hour ,not 829000 mind you, they have very precise methods to calculate all this ,unfortunatly none of this we can verify ,they are all extremely complicated mathematical equacions that will give any sane person a headache only a few insane proffesors in service to the elite with million dollar salaries who can figure it out ,
while the pole star polaris always stays at the same place above the north pool, the only thing we can verify, the rest is all completly ridiculous and there is no way you can verify any of it ,just go stand underneath the night sky whitout any of the preprogramming and try to verify any of their claims,but they have convinced generations of humans to believe their unbelieveable nonsense,
this is alot easer than you might think we still have most of the humans on this lake believe in a imaginary gods and lately ,the show must go on ,aliens, and they are willing to kill you if you dont agree with them, to program a human is very easy they believe anything that is based on the preprogrammed "truths" trueout the ages ,and even if you show them its not true they will simply not believe you ,most of the truths are right in front of our own eyes and we dont see them, even with alot of information and a high fequency that most humans on this lake dont have 99%, it takes years to deprogram simple lies and know the truth.
That this giant is stationary ,why not so is polaris apparently, our know galaxy resolves around earth and polaris,the ether keeps it all in place ,but that is another story .
I'm going to tell you perhaps the greatest piece of knowledge anyone can voice. Let me see what you can do with it.
Do you know that at this very moment you are surrounded by eternity? And do you know that you can use that eternity, if you so desire?
There! Eternity is there! All around! Do you know that you can extend yourself forever in any of the directions I have pointed to? Do you know that one moment can be eternity? This is not a riddle; it's a fact, but only if you mount that moment and use it to take the totality of yourself forever in any direction.
You didn't have this knowledge before, now you do. I have revealed it to you, but it doesn't make a bit of difference, because you don't have enough personal power to utilize my revelation. Yet if you did have enough power, my words alone would serve as the means for you to round up the totality of yourself and to get the crucial part of it out of the boundaries in which it is contained.
Your body is the boundary I'm talking about. One can get out of it. We are a feeling, an awareness encased here. We are luminous beings and for a luminous being only personal power matters
I'm not sure what Stanley Kubrick was up to, but one can clearly see a Templar Cross on the side of the pod at the 0:20 mark of this clip from 2001 A Space Odyssey.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARJ8cAGm6JE
Hallo Eric
ich habe den Affen umgebracht. Das klingt nicht glaubwürdig, aber ich habe die Beweise. Und ich habe etwas gefunden, das - außer der flachen Erde - alles über den Haufen werfen wird.
Ich mußte immer mehr aufgeben und als von meinem ganzen tollen Wissen nichts mehr übrig war, bin ich belohnt worden.
Problematisch ist die Sprache - ich kann kaum Englisch - und die Frage, ob mein Post schon angekommen ist?
Ich versuche mal das Post hier hinein zu stelle und wenn ich es wieder finden, stelle ich meine ehauptung hier auf die Füße.
Warum schreibe ich hier? Weil Du mich über die flache Erde aufgeklärt hast.
Gehab' Dich wohl
Lutz Schnelle
Post a Comment